[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
VMs: RE: Paradigms Regained
> Jacques revived one Voynichese paradigm. I think that
> all the
> paradigms bear on the question of what is or not a
> "glyph". A prefix,
> infix, and suffix might be, in each case, a "glyph".
>From a different angle, these "prefixes", "infixes", "and
suffixes" may be composed of glyphs, not compose a glyph. It's
more likely in my mind that they are less conjugational, root or
declension oriented and far more systemic in nature. IMHO these
paradigms represent an artifact of a system, and are no more
glyphs themselves than -er, -est, -ing, etc. Just an opinion.